| 1. | As noted elsewhere, these socks have an obsession with indefinite block policy.
|
| 2. | This block violates basically all block policy.
|
| 3. | As for how I got here, rather than unblock-en-l, the WP : BLOCK policy page specifically pointed here.
|
| 4. | For the record, I support my own proposal that Wikipedia's block policy concede that blocks are intended to punish.
|
| 5. | Administrators are authorised to issue blocks in accordance with block policy, and the appeal grounds for blocks have also been authorised.
|
| 6. | Note that the WP : BLOCK policy only condones blocking for " repeated " insertions of material in violationg of BLP.
|
| 7. | The " bot " based block policy is a rather controversial subject that been there since I first became an administrator.
|
| 8. | Absent a demonstrable post-block policy violation AnemoneProjectors is permitted to edit . ( talk ) 20 : 54, 2 July 2006 ( UTC)
|
| 9. | :: : : There is a great difference in block policy or at least it's application across Wikipedia, which reflects the national culture.
|
| 10. | Block policy essentially requires that an editor admit his guilt, then explain what he will do in the future to make sure it doesn't happen.
|
मोबाइल