Third, Kreidie denies American Muslims have anything to do with terrorism. “Nobody in my community supports Osama,” he has announced , thereby in advance exonerating Muslims of connections to Al-Qaeda and making one wonder how much help he can provide the FBI. After the U.S. president personally signed the papers to close down the Holy Land Foundation, an Islamic “charity,” and the treasury secretary described it as an organization that “exists to raise money in the United States to promote terror,” Kreidie insisted on the foundation being a legitimate charitable organization. When the Pennsylvania state treasurer, Barbara Hafer, suspected that $210,000 stolen by individuals with Arabic names could be connected to terrorism, Kreidie jumped on her statement as baseless and inflammatory. अधिक विस्तृत रूप में क्रीडी कानून प्रवर्तन संस्थाओं के आतंकवाद प्रतिरोधी प्रयासों को नागरिक अधिकारों पर प्रबल अतिक्रमण तथा अरब और अमेरिकी मुसलमानों को नाराज करने वाला मानता है. वह तो आतंकवाद विरोधी प्रयासों को असंवैधानिक तक कहता है.
12.
In brief, the argument to maintain the MeK's terrorist designation is baseless. Following a court-mandated review of the MeK's terrorist designation, the secretary of state must soon decide whether to maintain this listing. With one simple signature, the Obama administration can help empower Iranians to seize control over their destiny-and perhaps end the mullahs' mad nuclear dash. Related Topics: Iran , US policy receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item संक्षेप में, एमईके को आतंकवादी उपाधि देना आधारहीन है। अनेक न्यायालयों द्वारा एमईके की आतंकवादी उपाधि की पुनर्समीक्षा के बाद राज्य सचिव को अत्यंत शीघ्र ही यह सुनिश्चित करना चाहिये कि क्या इस सूची को आगे भी जारी रखना है? ओबामा प्रशासन एक सामान्य ह्स्ताक्षर से ईरानी लोगों को सशक्त कर सकता है कि वह अपने भाग्य पर बने नियंत्रण से बाहर आ सकें और शायद मुल्लाओं के परमाणु पागलपन से भी।
13.
The Muslim response of denouncing these views as bias, as the “new anti-Semitism,” or “ Islamophobia ” is as baseless as accusing anti-Nazis of “Germanophobia” or anti-Communists of “Russophobia.” Instead of presenting themselves as victims, Muslims should address this fear by developing a moderate, modern, and good-neighborly version of Islam that rejects radical Islam, jihad, and the subordination of “infidels.” July 29, 2006 update : I am pleased to report that rayra.net and Freedom's Enemies have both produced lists of Sudden Jihad Syndrome incidents in the United States. I hope they continue to update their logs as incidents tragically continue to occur. इस रोग से इस्लाम के प्रति भय और मुसलमानों के प्रति अविश्वास की पुष्टि होती है जो 11 सितंबर के बाद के जनमत सर्वेक्षणों में निरंतर बढ़ रही है . इन विचारों को हतोत्साहित करने में मुसलमानों की प्रतिक्रिया पूर्वाग्रह पूर्ण है.इसे नवसेमेटिक विरोध या इस्लामोफोबिया कहना उसी प्रकार आधारहीन है जैसे नाजी विरोधियों को जर्मनोफोबिया और कम्युनिस्ट विरोधियों को रुसोफोबिया कहना . मुसलमानों को स्वयं को पीड़ित पक्ष के रुप में प्रस्तुत करने के बजाए उन्हें नरम , आधुनिक और अच्छे पड़ोसी वाले इस्लाम का स्वरुप विकसित करना चाहिए जो कट्टरपंथी इस्लाम को रद्द करता हो और काफिरों को पददलित न बनाता हो.
14.
Apr. 11, 2012 update : Ha'aretz opened its pages to Carl Perkal , a self-described “documentary film producer and media consultant living in Israel.” to attack this column in “Daniel Pipes' attack on Israeli Arabs is baseless and inflammatory.” I am accused of writing “an aggressive and confused jumble of half-truths and misunderstandings about the Arabs citizens of Israel.” Trouble is, I barely recognize what I wrote in Perkal's “baseless and inflammatory” attack on me. So, I won't respond to it. Apr. 22, 2012 update : Happily, Ariel Solomon replied to Perkal today in the Times of Israel , in “ Haaretz Publishes Spurious Attack Against Daniel Pipes.” Solomon comments there that “In his delusional piece, Perkal makes a number of erroneous arguments, writing as if he did not actually read Pipes's article.” Precisely. May 15, 2012 update : Perkal goes another round at “A Reply to Ariel Solomon,” where he disagrees with many specifics and concludes rather grandly by advising Solomon to “respond to the bigger picture as I have presented it both here and in my previous article. The fate of Israel may well depend on it.” Related Topics: Israel & Zionism , Palestinians receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item बिडम्बना है कि इन कार्यों का सबसे बडा परिणाम यह होगा कि अधिकतर अरब इजरायली मुखर रूप से यहूदी राज्य के अस्वामिभक्त नागरिक बने रहेंगे ( फिलीस्तीनी राज्य के स्वामिभक्त नागरिक के विपरीत) । इससे आगे अनेक मध्य पूर्वी मुस्लिम इजरायली बनने की आकाँक्षा रखते हैं ( जिसे मैं मुस्लिम आलिया कहता हूँ) । मेरे अनुसार इन प्राथमिकताओं से इजरायल की सरकार कठिन स्थिति में आ जायेगी और इसके लिये पर्याप्त प्रतिक्रिया नहीं दे पायेगी जिसके चलते आज जो कुछ शांतिपूर्ण दिख रहा है वह कल के लिये समस्या बन जायेगा।
