And on and on the fairess wheel goes, first I put Clyde beatty in, a person who had directly observed them fighting as stated in his book observation upon 40 years experince ( as I provided ) and has worked with 1, 000 tigers and lions, has accumilated atleast 25 tigers that were killed his lions documented by over 10 credible sources, of news paper and book archives, who he is the Guiness records book holders working with both lion and tiger simultaneously ( note I say simultaneously ) none of whats in place have any verification working with both and specifically seen them fight, ( or else prove it, prove those sources have seen fights, not just assuming ) backed by via news articles and books, yet it gets removed in conjunction by a absolutely no credentials ( History ) level of science, then when I put in a scholar masters degree authority, the zoo keeper who is less credible and reliable then both of the contradictive exclusions, its then dis-regarded yet again, just because a person owns a dog, doesnt mean he knows the history, origin, import / export, leinage, blood-line ect . . . . the same way a zoo keeper doesnt know the history nor cites any specifics of the romans, there were over 50 emperors, in over 5 centurys, where are the records then to support the zoo keeper?
