A vast disconnect, in other words, exists between the high-flying words of politicians and the sometimes sordid realities of counterterrorism. This discrepancy has real costs: दूसरे शब्दों में राजनेताओं के उड़ते शब्द और आतंकवाद प्रतिरोध की कठोर सच्चाई के मध्य बड़ा भेद है। इस विभेद की अपनी कीमत है -
12.
U.S. law enforcement agencies have generally responded to 9/11 with a pretend counterterrorism policy. They still insist that naming the enemy as Islamism causes terrorism, that Islamist violence poses no more threat than that of neo-Nazis, racial supremacists, et al., and that counterterrorism primarily involves feel-good measures such as improving civil rights, passing anti-discrimination laws, and displaying goodwill to Islamists. न्यूयार्क शहर की आतंकवाद प्रतिरोध की प्रशंसा में
13.
U.S. law enforcement agencies have generally responded to 9/11 with a pretend counterterrorism policy. They still insist that naming the enemy as Islamism causes terrorism, that Islamist violence poses no more threat than that of neo-Nazis, racial supremacists, et al., and that counterterrorism primarily involves feel-good measures such as improving civil rights, passing anti-discrimination laws, and displaying goodwill to Islamists. न्यूयार्क शहर की आतंकवाद प्रतिरोध की प्रशंसा में
14.
Palestinian anger could prompt violence in America. Ken Piernick, who had headed the FBI counterterrorism efforts against Hamas, told the New York Sun : “In time, a very volatile and vitriolic hostility brewing in Gaza in particular will slowly suffuse itself to Hamas and Hezbollah cells in America. In the past couple of years we have already seen inflammatory rhetoric from their supporters in the United States. At some point in time it's like the glass rod will snap.” हिंसक हमास के संभावित सदस्य अमेरिका में दिखने भी लगे हैं .
15.
Why does the leading law-enforcement institution in the United States hide its counterterrorism efforts? It's known that some mosques throughout the West have been used as a base for terror, filling a variety of roles: अमेरिकी की कानून प्रवर्तन संस्थायें अपने आतंकवाद प्रतिरोध प्रयासों को क्यों छिपाती है ? यह सर्वविदित है कि समस्त पश्चिम में कुछ मस्जिदें आतंक के आधार के रूप में अनेक भूमिकायें निभाती हैं।
16.
This reader is struck by two major deficiencies. First, while the book covers six topics (the Arab-Israeli conflict, Iran, Iraq, counterterrorism, nuclear proliferation, and political and economic development), its specialists have almost nothing to say about Islamism, the most pressing ideological challenge of our time, nor about the Iranian nuclear buildup, the most urgent military danger of our time. They also manage to bypass such issues as Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Arab rejectionism of Israel, the Russian danger, and the transfer of wealth to energy-exporting states. इस क्षेत्र में रूस एक शत्रु शक्ति के रूप में फिर से उभर रहा है।
17.
Counterterrorism efforts got a major boost last week when an American district court found three Muslim organizations and one individual, mostly based in the Chicago area, guilty of funding Hamas and fined them an astonishing US$156 million. (बोयम परीक्षण) आतंकित करने के लिए कुरान का उपयोग पिछले सप्ताह आतंकवाद प्रतिरोध के कार्य का बड़ा उत्साहवर्द्धन हुआ. जब अमेरिका की एक जिला अदालत ने शिकागो स्थित तीन मुस्लिम संगठनों और एक व्यक्ति को हमास को आर्थिक सहायता प्रदान करने का दोषी करार देते हुए उसपर 156 मिलियन अमेरिकी डॉलर का जुर्माना किया .
18.
In brief, an organization connected to terrorists swoons over the administration's pretend counterterrorism policy while the grieving father of a terrorist scornfully dismisses it. That tells us everything. What now, with the enshrining of a fringe study as national policy? There are no shortcuts: Those who want a genuine counterterrorism policy must work to remove the Left and the multiculturalists from government. संक्षेप में एक संगठन जो कि आतंकवादियों से सम्बद्ध है वह प्रशासन की इस छद्म आतंकवादी प्रतिरोध नीति पर अत्यंत प्रसन्नता का भाव व्यक्त करता है जबकि आतंकवादी का दुखी पिता इस पर व्यंग्य करते हुए इसे खारिज कर देता है। यही अपने आप में सब कुछ कह जाता है।
19.
In brief, an organization connected to terrorists swoons over the administration's pretend counterterrorism policy while the grieving father of a terrorist scornfully dismisses it. That tells us everything. What now, with the enshrining of a fringe study as national policy? There are no shortcuts: Those who want a genuine counterterrorism policy must work to remove the Left and the multiculturalists from government. संक्षेप में एक संगठन जो कि आतंकवादियों से सम्बद्ध है वह प्रशासन की इस छद्म आतंकवादी प्रतिरोध नीति पर अत्यंत प्रसन्नता का भाव व्यक्त करता है जबकि आतंकवादी का दुखी पिता इस पर व्यंग्य करते हुए इसे खारिज कर देता है। यही अपने आप में सब कुछ कह जाता है।
20.
Worse, the speech drum-rolled the appointment of a U.S. special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference, directing this envoy to “listen to and learn from” his Muslim counterparts. But the OIC is a Saudi-sponsored organization promoting the Wahhabi agenda under the trappings of a Muslim-only United Nations. As counterterrorism specialist Steven Emerson has noted, Bush's dismal initiative stands in “complete ignorance of the rampant radicalism, pro-terrorist, and anti-American sentiments routinely found in statements by the OIC and its leaders.” इसके बजाय उन्होंने मध्य पूर्व से बाहर कट्टरपंथ के विरूद्ध संघर्ष तथा व्यापक रूप में ऐसे कट्टरपंथियों के गुट का उल्लेख किया जो प्रभाव और सत्ता प्राप्त करने के लिए धर्म का प्रयोग कर रहे हैं।
