In his book " Hopkins Reconstructed " ( 2000 ), Justus George Lawler critiques Robert Martin s controversial biography " Gerard Manley Hopkins : A Very Private Life " ( 1991 ) by suggesting that Martin " cannot see the heterosexual beam . . . for the homosexual biographical mote in his own eye . . . it amounts to a slanted eisegesis ".
12.
Unfortunately, this has been a frustrating experience as many of the editors are still letting their feelings get in the way of doing any productive work and despite verifiable sources to the case are often more interested in " ignoring the exegetical context of the verifiable source evidence and instead using exegesis " and / or " unnecessary and unreasonable debunking ( by eisegesis ) " those sources that justify the positions of the esoteric article, than they are in actually doing any sort of cooperative rewrite.
