This result does not have a non-decimal low nibble, but it does cause a carry out of the least significant digit ( lower four bits ) into the most significant digit ( upper four bits ).
12.
Montgomery multiplication is an alternative algorithm that processed the multiplier " backwards " ( least significant digit first ) and uses the least significant digit of the accumulator to control whether or not the modulus should be added / subtracted.
13.
Montgomery multiplication is an alternative algorithm that processed the multiplier " backwards " ( least significant digit first ) and uses the least significant digit of the accumulator to control whether or not the modulus should be added / subtracted.
14.
As in the SSEM from which it was developed, and in contrast to the established mathematical convention, the machine's storage was arranged with the least significant digits to the left; thus a one was represented in five bits as " 10000 ", rather than the more conventional " 00001 ".
15.
:" In the following notes, wherever numeric equalities are shown in " concise form ", such as, the two digits between the parentheses denotes the uncertainty at 1-? ( 1 standard deviation, 68 % confidence level ) in the two least significant digits of the significand ."
16.
Since that's in the least significant digit, we're probably looking at different roundoff errors between numbers obtained from different sources . . . so the Ranger 4 article is actually pretty reasonably self-consistent ( although one could wish they'd used the same representation in all three places in order to avoid confusion ).
17.
The larger the base, the rarer pandigital numbers become, though one can always find runs of b ^ x consecutive pandigital numbers with redundant digits by writing all the digits of the base together ( but not putting the zero first as the most significant digit ) and adding " x " + 1 zeroes at the end as least significant digits.
18.
I can see for example that every digit is doubled and then if it is greater than 10 you keep the least significant digit and add the most significant to the next one after it is doubled but then with everything you need to keep track of I feel it looks a lot similar to what would be done simply by using big ints-- talk ) 15 : 46, 29 December 2011 ( UTC)
19.
The above property can be informally observed by considering the primes of a chain in base 2 . ( Note that, as with all bases, multiplying by the number of the base " shifts " the digits to the left . ) When we consider p _ { i + 1 } = 2p _ i + 1 in base 2, we see that, by multiplying p _ i by 2, the least significant digit of p _ i becomes the secondmost least significant digit of p _ { i + 1 }.
20.
The above property can be informally observed by considering the primes of a chain in base 2 . ( Note that, as with all bases, multiplying by the number of the base " shifts " the digits to the left . ) When we consider p _ { i + 1 } = 2p _ i + 1 in base 2, we see that, by multiplying p _ i by 2, the least significant digit of p _ i becomes the secondmost least significant digit of p _ { i + 1 }.
