The cyclic behavior of repeating decimals in multiplication also leads to the construction of integers which are cyclically permuted when multiplied by certain numbers.
12.
First recognize that " X " is the repeating digits of a repeating decimal, which always possesses cyclic behavior in multiplication.
13.
First recognize that " X " is the repeating digits of a repeating decimal, which always possesses a cyclic behavior in multiplication.
14.
If it does not I believe that would mean that either no repeating decimal has a distinct location or that there are odd gaps in the continuum.
15.
You could code the info into digits of 0-9 and then use a fraction-reverser to find the fraction of that set of repeating decimals.
16.
My dad refuses this proof because he says the repeating decimal never actually exactly equals the fraction; therefore, . 999 . . . never quite equals 1.
17.
I don't follow how you reach your conclusion that " either no repeating decimal has a distinct location or that there are odd gaps in the continuum ".
18.
*PM : converting a repeating decimal to a fraction, id = 9185 new !-- WP guess : converting a repeating decimal to a fraction-- Status:
19.
*PM : converting a repeating decimal to a fraction, id = 9185 new !-- WP guess : converting a repeating decimal to a fraction-- Status:
20.
It is necessary for F to be coprime to 10 in order that is a repeating decimal without any preceding non-repeating digits ( see multiple sections of Repeating decimal ).
