:: : * The Elliott wave principle and Socionomics articles do not directly discuss my company or its products.
12.
But given that the academic world ignores socionomics, then how can it be shown that it is non-scientific?
13.
I have emailed you ( Nov . 21 ) regarding the socionomics mediation, though you haven't acknowledged the message.
14.
The diff shows that he removed my edit saying that socionomics has little or no academic support in this last edit.
15.
As for " myself ", my contributions have mostly been to Elliott wave principle, Socionomics, and Robert Prechter.
16.
:: The top link in this section does not refer, as Folsom claims, to the mediator in the socionomics case.
17.
Besides, we have trivially obvious synthesis in the section headings, which claim a heretofore unpublished similarity between Socionomics and earlier ideas.
18.
I " opened " the talk pages for Socionomics and Robert Prechter, and made substantial contributions to the " criticism " sections.
19.
In an interview, Futures editors asked him to discuss this study of socionomics and how traders can use it in today's markets ."
20.
:: Folsom ( below ) states that he has " not claimed that ( socionomics ) has'scientific standing'" This is just incredible!
