After adding a disambiguation page perhaps people who are educated in those areas ( university or above ) will notice the need for, and start adding, articles for what " conditional operator " means in different fields?
22.
If we introduce an intensional conditional operator then we can say that the starving ought to be fed " only on the condition that there are in fact starving " : in symbols O ( A / B ).
23.
Many languages have an operator to accomplish the same purpose, generally referred to as a conditional operator ( or, less accurately, as a ternary operator ); the best known is ? :, as used in C, C + +, and related languages.
24.
Some of the problems with the IIf function, as discussed later, do not exist with a conditional operator, because the language is free to examine the type and delay evaluation of the operands, as opposed to simply passing them to a library function.
25.
In one article I use the term " conditional operator " . " Conditional operator " on wikipedia is a redirection page to " ? : ( programming ) " but the term conditional operator has more uses than only " ? : ".
26.
In one article I use the term " conditional operator " . " Conditional operator " on wikipedia is a redirection page to " ? : ( programming ) " but the term conditional operator has more uses than only " ? : ".
27.
In one article I use the term " conditional operator " . " Conditional operator " on wikipedia is a redirection page to " ? : ( programming ) " but the term conditional operator has more uses than only " ? : ".
28.
The reason is that nesting two conditional operators produces an oversized condition with the last two options as its branches : c1 ? o1 : c2 ? o2 : o3 is really ( ( c1 ? o1 : c2 ) ? o2 : o3 ).
29.
Due to an unfortunate design of the language grammar, the conditional operator in PHP is left associative in contrast to other languages, thus given a value of "'T "'for "'arg "', the PHP code in the following example would yield the value "'horse "'instead of "'train "'as one might expect:
30.
Therefore, a classical-based logical system does not need the conditional operator " ?! " if " ?" ( not ) and " ( " " ( or ) are already in use, or may use the " ?! " only as a syntactic sugar for a compound having one negation and one disjunction.
