Several genera in addition to " Indraloris " and " Sivaladapis " are now allocated to Sivaladapidae, which is known from the Eocene through the Miocene of China, Thailand, Myanmar, India, and Pakistan.
22.
In 2005, however, American paleontologists Lawrence Flynn and Mich�le Morgan described five teeth of " Indraloris " from fossil sites in the older Kamlial Formation as a second species in the genus, " Indraloris kamlialensis ".
23.
In 2005, however, American paleontologists Lawrence Flynn and Mich�le Morgan described five teeth of " Indraloris " from fossil sites in the older Kamlial Formation as a second species in the genus, " Indraloris kamlialensis ".
24.
Gingerich and Sahni suggested that " Indraloris " was probably arboreal and that it may have been more frugivorous ( eating fruit ) than " Sivaladapis ", which they interpreted as a folivore ( leaf-eater ).
25.
.. . that although the first two fossils of " "'Indraloris " "'to be found were misidentified as a carnivoran and a loris, it is in fact a member of the extinct adapiform primates?
26.
In 1985, Vasishat continued to classify " Indraloris " and " Sivaladapis " in a single genus, and " Indraloris himalayensis " and " Sivaladapis nagrii " in a single species, but other authors have not followed this classification.
27.
In 1985, Vasishat continued to classify " Indraloris " and " Sivaladapis " in a single genus, and " Indraloris himalayensis " and " Sivaladapis nagrii " in a single species, but other authors have not followed this classification.
28.
In " Indraloris himalayensis " lower molars, there are four main cusps ( protoconid and metaconid in the trigonid, hypoconid and entoconid in the talonid ), which give the crown a rectangular aspect, although the labial cusps ( protoconid and hypoconid ) are placed somewhat anterior to their lingual counterparts.
29.
It was not until 1968 that American anthropologist Ian Tattersall noted that Pilgrim's " Sivanasua " species had been misidentified; he suggested that " Sivanasua himalayensis " was probably the same as " Indraloris lulli ", but left the affinities of " Sivanasua palaeindica " open.
30.
They recognized " Sivanasua himalayensis " and " Indraloris lulli " as representing the same species, " Indraloris himalayensis ", and created the new genus " Sivaladapis " for " Sivanasua palaeindica " and another species that had been named later, " Sivanasua nagrii ".
