Please note that this is not a reflection on the validity of the " Historical revisionism ( negationism ) " article as any discussion of that will be done at the appropriate time in the proper forum, not now . talk ) 23 : 27, 10 May 2008 ( UTC)
22.
I'd like to point out that it seems to me of the upmost importance of having a decent page on revisionism on a " free-for-all-to-edit encyclopedia ", lest Wikipedia becomes a platform for negationism theories and thus a totally anti-democratic project.
23.
The warfare-like atmosphere is certainly not appropriate for the healthy discussion of how to improve an article and this mentality of negationism, opportunism, and deep-seated enmity against other ethnic groups ( Armenians, Greeks, etc . ) clearly illustrates how TheDarkLordSeth's promises to improve himself ring hollow.
24.
Koenraad Elst refers to Lal's statistics in his book Negationism in India : Concealing the Record of Islam, remarking that " More research is needed before we can settle for a quantitatively accurate evaluation of Muslim rule in India, but at least we know for sure that the term crime against humanity is not exaggerated ."
25.
I have not added it there because there is a further sub-category, negationism, which the article concentrates on and the examples given are so repugnant that I fear its very presence would violate NPOV . ( Anti-Stratfordism is a relatively benign fantasy compared to the examples on that page, even though its methodology is identical .)
26.
The issue was discussed to death at ScienceApologist's talk page ( a discussion which started out as a complaint from Smatprt that he was being harrassed ), and I thought it was settled when ScienceApologist opined that " It seems reasonable to me to keep SAQ off of the negationism page, but it seems reasonable to put it on the pseudohistory page.
27.
That legitimate historical revisionism acknowledges the existence of a " certain body of irrefutable evidence " and the existence of a " convergence of evidence ", which suggest that an event such as the Black Death, American slavery, and the Holocaust did occur; whereas the denialism of history rejects the entire foundation of historical evidence, which is a form of historical negationism.
28.
As a 16 month ban had apparently taught you nothing, I had hoped that 8 months restricting you from an area where you cause so much disruption ( for example creating articles like Historical revisionism ( negationism ) ( disambiguation ) on 11 : 59, 5 May 2008 ) will allow you time to develop you collegiate skills, but this ANI makes me wonder if that is possible .-- talk ) 15 : 13, 4 October 2009 ( UTC)
29.
You dont seem to have talked on why it was not constructive . the explanation seems to be given . it seems more like your comment was about you doing Historical revisionism ( negationism ) and seem to give your own opinion about well constructed facts . instead of being a denier of history, you can try to talk about putting the things proposed in the article . as we can clearly see from previous sources about the CAMERA case about lobbying people like zay and jayjg was paid for.
30.
User : Igor " the Otter " seems to have followed the well worn path of negationist and switched his / her attention to Bombing of Dresden in World War II . As the negationism article says " " Claims of " counter-genocide ", leading to a confusion between victims and executioners ( for example, the Bombing of Dresden in World War II has been said by Holocaust deniers to be a " counter-genocide ", thus transforming the German people into victims and henceforth exempting them from any kind of moral responsibility; . . . " ".
