When ??????? has such a extreme biased attitude towards then Peking multi-nations diplomats, when ??????? called them invaders and terrorists, there is really not a slim chance that he would be able to contribute any neutral material on WP . " talk " 02 : 54, 22 May 2011 ( UTC)
22.
Captain Occam made an even odder edit, removing only the part of a longer quote from Joan Freeman which here . ) Conclusion : David . Kane and others have been gaming the system by using BLP policy as another bogus excuse to remove neutral material that goes against their personal point of view.
23.
That seems to be a statement attacking opponents of neonatal circumcision, as well as inciting a lack of good faith in contributors who edit circumcision pages in such a way that correct non-neutral material that is biased in favour of male circumcision, or in their view fails to properly summarize and integrate views that are more critical of circumcision.
