The expression'Snow's being white', which refers to the condition snow's being white, is a nominalization of the sentence'Snow is white'.'The truth of the proposition that snow is white'is a nominalization of the sentence'the proposition that snow is white is true '.
22.
The expression'Snow's being white', which refers to the condition snow's being white, is a nominalization of the sentence'Snow is white'.'The truth of the proposition that snow is white'is a nominalization of the sentence'the proposition that snow is white is true '.
23.
Old and Middle Khmer used particles to mark grammatical categories and many of these have survived in Modern Khmer but are used sparingly, mostly in literary or formal language . actor nominalization, should be treated as a morphological process or a purely syntactic device, and some derivational morphology seems to be " purely decorative " and performs no known syntactic work.
24.
Another example of this nominalization of adjectives is found in this saying attributed to Napoleon : " From the sublime to the ridiculous is only a step " ( in French : " Du sublime au ridicule il n'y a qu'un pas " ) .-- Talk 09 : 55, 11 July 2007 ( UTC)
25.
Some say that the truthmaker of the proposition that Socrates is sitting ( assuming he is ! ) is " Socrates'being seated " ( whatever exactly that might turn out to be on the correct ontology ) and in general the truthmaker of the truthbearer expressed by a sentence " s " can be denoted by the participial nominalization of " s ".
26.
The word " call " is a shortened form of " call for ", which means " to come and get ", so " will call " literally means " ( the customer ) will call ( come and get ) ( the goods ) . " In a linguistic process similar to initial-stress derived nominalization, the first syllable of the noun phrase is usually stressed ( " WILL call " ) rather than the second syllable in the verb phrase ( " will CALL " ).
27.
According to Andr?Muller Weitzenhoffer, a researcher in the field of hypnosis, " the major weakness of Bandler and Grinder's linguistic analysis is that so much of it is built upon untested hypotheses and is supported by totally inadequate data . " Weitzenhoffer adds that Bandler and Grinder misuse formal logic and mathematics, redefine or misunderstand terms from the linguistics lexicon ( " e . g . ", nominalization ), create a scientific fa�ade by needlessly complicating Ericksonian concepts with unfounded claims, make factual errors, and disregard or confuse concepts central to the Ericksonian approach.
