Gerald is now serving up to 40 years tack by some child abuse experts and civil libertarians on the suggestive questioning of children and the " pseudo science " which prosecutors used in building these charges, the Fells Acres case is being reexamined.
22.
I very strongly share your views on the actual merits of pseudo science, but I disagree with you about the extent & manner to Wikipedia should cover such topics, and the appropriateness of covering notable but not very-notable figures and organisations in the field.
23.
Allowing User : ScienceApologist to edit the " Atropa belladonna " page and to contribute to talk pages on fringe science articles, homeopathy articles, and any article on Wikipedia that can be used as by him and his cohorts as an anti-pseudo science banner is simply " expanding the problem, " that brought about the initial arbcom cases.
24.
I'm also extremely concerned that there is a lot of factional POV pushing going on, with one faction seemingly intent on placing skeptical comments everywhere, and continually calling things into question using science standards rather than pseudo science standards ( as would be correct in this instance ), and another faction adding in content from special interest website that make statements without offering any data to back them up ( when claiming a result, I'd like to see the analysis ).
25.
With this new formulation of " Fringe ", we get the challenge of a sophisticated crime drama mixed with sad sack characters that tempt the everyman into the game, while blowing us away with a level of wordplay and pseudo science that CSI or Alias could only have dreamed of . " The A . V . Club's Noel Murray enjoyed the episode, giving it a B +, while " Television Without Pity " gave the episode a B -.
26.
My primary motive for requesting such a guideline is that I've run into several user who are constantly reverting pages or arguing over content when people have been trying to record what exactly it is that pseudoscientists are saying, and what the history of a given area of pseudo science is, on the grounds that what they said " can't be proven to be true " and the belief that " stating that they said it means advocating it as being true " . perfectblue 12 : 35, 13 January 2007 ( UTC)
27.
Any talk page he posts on will bring about a posse of rabid anti-fringe-scientists who will attempt, as they are doing on the " A . belladonna " article, to insert anti-fringe science banners in 100 ways, edit warring about it, debating the issue for months on end in hopes of attriting the opposition, and originally interpreting any reference they can find to support the harshest anti pseudo science statement they can possible put into an article, no matter how much undue weight, and no matter how tangentially related to the article.
