:I mention primary sources because Cindery's argument relied on what she claimed was the " subject's self-affiliation / self-description ".
32.
Thinking I would ignore / avoid him, since I was actively avoiding him, he used a sockpuppet .-Cindery 05 : 21, 20 January 2007 ( UTC)
33.
I've apologized repeatedly for the uncivil comment-it's pretty mild compared to the kind of abuse Cindery routinely dishes out, but that's no excuse.
34.
If you have definite proof, lay it out for all to see; if you don't, stop whining and avoid MastCell ( MastCell, also avoid Cindery ).
35.
Here & ndash;, Cindery threatens off-wiki actions against those who " vandalise " ( i . e . go against her wishes on ) certain articles on Wikipedia.
36.
A sentence or two could perhaps be merged into an article about Canadian discrimination lawsuits or something, if one exists .-Cindery 01 : 24, 1 February 2007 ( UTC)
37.
Your Barrington diffs don't take into account his sockpuppet, Girondin, in December . . . and so on .-Cindery 10 : 09, 20 January 2007 ( UTC)
38.
To complicate matters, Cindery ( currently blocked for disruption and abusive sockpuppetry ), whose misunderstanding I was attempting to correct, is an editor with whom I've had disagreements in the past.
39.
If you do it again, I will note it immediately at the location with a link to this page and make another report .-Cindery 04 : 34, 20 January 2007 ( UTC)
40.
You probably shouldn't be commenting at all without noting that-- unless you're trying to derail the subject ? )-Cindery 21 : 34, 20 January 2007 ( UTC)
