The copulative adjective concord consists of just the simple noun prefix, except in class 9 where the full " in-" is used, and class 8 " zin-" which has an additional " n ".
32.
Western Yugur also contains archaisms which are attested in neither modern Uyghuric nor Siberian, such as its anticipating counting system coinciding with Old Uyghur, and its copula " dro ", which originated from Old Uyghur but substitute the Uyghur copulative personal suffixes.
33.
Uniquely, the existence of the copulative verbalizer suffix in the Southern Peruvian Aymaran language variety, Muylaq Aymara, is evident only in the surfacing of a vowel that would otherwise have been deleted because of the presence of a following suffix, lexically prespecified to suppress it.
34.
The fact that the final vowel of-" iri " below is not suppressed indicates the presence of an intervening segment, the copulative verbalizer : " sar ( a )-iri-?-t-wa " I usually go.
35.
However, it is also relevant to note that in a verb phrase like'it is old', the noun " thantha " meaning'old'does not require the copulative verbalizer, " thantha-wa "'it is old '.
36.
Perhaps one simply must ensure that the copulative verbs in question are "'inchoate "'if he wishes to avoid using the supporting " do . " The " became not a doctor " clause clearly does not work since the " becoming " is understood as already having happened.
37.
Accordingly, unlike in most other Aymaran variants, whose copulative verbalizer is expressed with a vowel-lengthening component,-" : ", the presence of the copulative verbalizer in Muylaq Aymara is often not apparent on the surface at all and is analyzed as existing only meta-linguistically.
38.
Accordingly, unlike in most other Aymaran variants, whose copulative verbalizer is expressed with a vowel-lengthening component,-" : ", the presence of the copulative verbalizer in Muylaq Aymara is often not apparent on the surface at all and is analyzed as existing only meta-linguistically.
39.
There are no other words so likely to yield exceptions; because there are no other words, between which the insertion of the copulative, would effect so remarkable a deviation from the established form of constructing them to express one person; and of course, would so pointedly suggest a difference of signification ."
40.
If those analyses do not give an accurate answer to this particular question about the anaphoric pronoun that is in contextual deixis, then, as for its descriptivism, I tend to see this as the question of the verb s inherent modality, namely, whether the verb is a copulative one or a linking verb.
