During the 1990s, the agency's role in supporting military contingencies and humanitarian assistance operations grew dramatically. Operation Desert Shield began in August 1990 in response to an Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Soon after President George Bush announced the involvement of the U.S. military, the agency was at the center of the effort to support the deployment to the Middle East and later the war. In those first critical months, most of the supplies transported to Saudi Arabia - from bread to boots, from nerve gas antidote to jet fuel - came from DLA stock. During this operation and the subsequent Operation Desert Storm, the agency provided the military services with over $3 billion of food, clothing, textiles, medical supplies, and weapons system repair parts in response to over 2 million requisitions. The mission execution included providing supply support, contract management, and technical and logistics services to all military services, unified commands, and several allied nations. The quality of supply support that DLA provided American combat forces during these operations earned it the Joint Meritorious Service Award in 1991. मनोवैज्ञानिक प्रभाव है और भय के रूप में गंभीरता और मनोवैज्ञानिक प्रभाव की लंबाई को अधिकतम करने के लिए - यह हमला इस तरह से किया गया.आतंकवाद के प्रत्येक कार्य १ प्रदर्शन कई बड़ी दर्शकों पर अच्छा असर पड़ता है करने के लिए तैयार है.आतंकवादियों ने भी उनकी शक्ति और देश या समाज के लिए वे विरोध कर रहे हैं की नींव हिला को दिखाने के लिए राष्ट्रीय प्रतीकों पर हमला.समय की वैधता को बढ़ाने यह नकारात्मक एक सरकार की वैधता को प्रभावित मई को दिया आतंकवादी संगठन (terrorist organization) और / या विचारधारा (ideology) एक आतंकवादी कार्रवाई के पीछे.
32.
A consensus exists that the two parties are growing further apart over time. Pro-Israel, conservative Jeff Jacoby of the Boston Globe finds that “the old political consensus that brought Republicans and Democrats together in support of the Middle East's only flourishing democracy is breaking down.” Anti-Israel, left-wing James Zogby of the Arab American Institute agrees, writing that “traditional U.S. policy toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict does not have bipartisan backing.” Thanks to changes in the Democratic party, Israel has become a partisan issue in American politics, an unwelcome development for it. In late March 2010, during a nadir of U.S.-Israel relations, Janine Zacharia wrote in the Washington Post that some Israelis expect their prime minister to “search for ways to buy time until the midterm U.S. elections [of November 2010] in hopes that Obama would lose support and that more pro-Israel Republicans would be elected.” That an Israeli leader is thought to stall for fewer Congressional Democrats confirms the changes outlined here. It also provides guidance for voters. इस बात पर सहमति है कि दोनों राजनीतिक दल कुछ अवसरों पर पूरी तरह भिन्न हो जाते है। बोस्टन ग्लोब के परम्परावादी इजरायल समर्थक लेखक जेफ जेकोबी ने पाया है, “ एक पुरानी आम सहमति जो कि मध्य पूर्व के एकमात्र फलने फूलने वाले लोकतंत्र के समर्थन में डेमोक्रेट और रिपब्लिकन को एक साथ लाती थी वह अब टूट रही है” । इजरायल विरोधी वामपंथी सोच के जेम्स जेकोबी जो कि अरब इन्सटीट्यूट से हैं वे भी सहमत हैं, और लिखते हैं, “ परम्परागत रूप से इजरायल फिलीस्तीन संघर्ष के सम्बंध में अमेरिकी नीति विभाजित नीति पर नहीं थी” । डेमोक्रेटिक पार्टी में परिवर्तन के चलते इजरायल अब अमेरिकी राजनीति में विभाजित मुद्दा बन गया है जो कि इसके लिये स्वागतयोग्य नहीं है।
33.
While several scholars demanded a review of the punishment for apostates in the light of the changing modern values, others refuted their argument saying the original Islamic texts call for harsh punishments. “Religious freedom is a right that should be guaranteed to every human being. We have come here to present and discuss different viewpoints and we should do it in order to reach the right solution,” said Mahmoud Zaqzouq, Egypt's minister of endowments. Some participants doubted the validity of texts quoted in support of the beheading of apostates. On the other hand, several others were adamant in their refusal to the demand for a lighter approach toward apostates in the name of freedom of religion. “The view that Islamic scholars of the past had different views on how to punish apostates is incorrect. They only disagreed on how soon apostates should be executed; should it be done in three days, one week or few months. The waiting time is left to the discretion of the ruler,” said Muhammad Al-Nujaimi, a professor at the Higher Institute of Law in Riyadh. June 3, 2012 update : Darul Uloom Deoband, a key Indian Muslim institution, has delivered what MEMRI calls “a revolutionary fatwa (edict) against polygamy , advising Muslims in India not to contract a second marriage.” Their fatwa reads, in the unedited English: निष्कर्ष रूप में यही विचार है: अमेरिका के लोगों के पास इस्लाम का ज्ञान है जो कि प्रभावित करने लायक है। उग्रवादी इस्लाम के प्रति क्षमाप्रार्थी का भाव रखने वालों के दावे के विपरीत कि अमेरिका के लोग इस सम्बंध में अज्ञानी हैं मेरे पाठक जानते हैं कि वे किस विषय में बात कर रहे हैं। उनकी समालोचना कुछ अवसरों पर काफी ज्ञानवर्धक (जैसे कि कुरान में कुछ विषय समाप्त किये जाने पर) और कुछ अवसरों पर यह अभिव्यक्ति से भरपूर है( अगली बार जब सडक पर या भवन में इजरायल के नागरिक को समाप्त करने से सम्बंधित कोई फिल्म क्लिप देखें जो जरा सोचें कि वास्तव में बुराई कहाँ है” )
