| 31. | Instead the sequence that emerges from the first isomorphism theorem is
|
| 32. | By composing both isomorphisms, we obtain a linear homeomorphism.
|
| 33. | The canonical isomorphism is defined on x \ in G as follows:
|
| 34. | In terms of the Grassmannian, this is a canonical isomorphism
|
| 35. | Exactness immediately implies that the map " * is an isomorphism.
|
| 36. | The Curry Howard isomorphism associates a term in the intuitionistic propositional logic.
|
| 37. | Therefore, F is an isomorphism and the first statement is proven.
|
| 38. | Is an isomorphism ( and not just an equivalence ).
|
| 39. | Tannaka's theorem then says that this map is an isomorphism.
|
| 40. | This is stronger than " up to algebraic isomorphism ".
|
