| 31. | The diversity of characteristics complicates any description of the Liliaceae morphology, and confused taxonomic classification for centuries.
|
| 32. | Over time, it has seen much reorganisation and at various times was combined with the related Liliaceae.
|
| 33. | The early 20th century was marked by increasing doubts about the placement of the alliaceous genera within Liliaceae.
|
| 34. | Thus'Alliaceae'were variously included in either Liliaceae, Amaryllidaceae, or as a separate entity.
|
| 35. | These genera have been treated as either liliaceous or amaryllidaceaous ( see Taxonomy of Liliaceae ) over time.
|
| 36. | The genus was at one time placed in a broadly defined Liliaceae, along with many other lilioid monocots.
|
| 37. | Liliaceae are widely distributed, mainly in temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere and the flowers are insect pollinated.
|
| 38. | Now placed in the family Asphodelaceae, the genus was formerly included in the lily family ( Liliaceae ).
|
| 39. | The major divergence within the Liliaceae appeared at about 36 34 mya, within Liliaceae " sensu"
|
| 40. | The major divergence within the Liliaceae appeared at about 36 34 mya, within Liliaceae " sensu"
|
