As non-cognitivism, the is / ought distinction, and the naturalistic fallacy began to be called into question, analytic philosophers began to show a renewed interest in the traditional questions of moral philosophy.
32.
:: : I agree the above answers the question, I think another article which is related and may be of interest is Naturalistic fallacy . talk ) 01 : 21, 15 September 2011 ( UTC)
33.
Moore originated the term " the naturalistic fallacy " to refer to the ( alleged ) error of confusing goodness with some natural property, and he deployed the Open Question Argument to show why this was an error.
34.
Wilson et al . state that Thornhill and Palmer dismiss all ethical objections with the phrase'naturalistic fallacy'although " it is Thornhill and Palmer who are thinking fallaciously by using the naturalistic fallacy in this way ."
35.
Wilson et al . state that Thornhill and Palmer dismiss all ethical objections with the phrase'naturalistic fallacy'although " it is Thornhill and Palmer who are thinking fallaciously by using the naturalistic fallacy in this way ."
36.
Left-wing critics assert that national-anarchism is a " Trojan horse for white nationalism " and represents what many separatist ideas based on naturalistic fallacy, racism, antisemitism, heterosexism, and antifeminism amongst grassroots activists.
37.
Certain uses of the naturalistic fallacy refutation ( a scheme of reasoning that declares an inference invalid because it incorporates an instance of the naturalistic fallacy ) have been criticized as lacking rational bases, and labelled anti-naturalistic fallacy.
38.
Certain uses of the naturalistic fallacy refutation ( a scheme of reasoning that declares an inference invalid because it incorporates an instance of the naturalistic fallacy ) have been criticized as lacking rational bases, and labelled anti-naturalistic fallacy.
39.
Certain uses of the naturalistic fallacy refutation ( a scheme of reasoning that declares an inference invalid because it incorporates an instance of the naturalistic fallacy ) have been criticized as lacking rational bases, and labelled anti-naturalistic fallacy.
40.
Evolutionary psychologists Peter K . Jonason and Rhonda Nicole Balzarini criticize the book for committing the naturalistic fallacy, getting the evolutionary history of humans wrong, ignoring selection occurring at the level of individuals / genes and instead assuming group selection.
