Just to finish the definition of " disaster " published in wikipedia, is as wrong as in the rest of the dictionaries, supported by the rest of the academic institutions, and therefore, wikipedia is not suitable source for promoting any significative change in the way authorities understand disaster . " The sudden alteration in collective interaction patterns of variables related in a system " is the proper disaster definition because it meet the universal criteria . . . it can be apply for any place, any where and for any kind or phenomena.
32.
Now . . . if not the "'great question "', not for you, but to our coleagues and the administrators of En Wiki, here is perhaps a significative question : "'Why just a Brazilian "'( Mr . Antiuser ) is so occupied in deconstruct the pages Cl�udio C�sar Dias Baptista and G�a about another Brazilian ( myself ), pages which were accepted and beautifully perfectioned by persons of other countries, who didn't find anything in these pages against any En Wiki's policy ? talk ) 17 : 23, 10 June 2011 ( UTC)
