The complication ( I hope someone can resolve ) arises here : the user in question is apparently experiencing " " technical difficulties " " so he uses an IP, however he signs his edits ( with PIO ), and it is unmistakeably obvious ( due to the identical, rather shaky grammar as well as my experiences with the user ) that this is indeed the person he claims to be.
32.
Reviews of the " History " were respectful and in most cases favourable, though some reservations were expressed . " The Gentleman's Magazine ", for example, noted the harshness with which Freeman treated his opponents and his " unmistakeably strong belief in the correctness of his own views ", but agreed with many of them, excepting only his insistence on spelling Anglo-Saxon personal names ( Saturday Review ", the " North American Review " and the " Literary World " all agreed in regretting Freeman's indifference to social history, as opposed to political and military history . " The Month ", a Catholic magazine, objected only to Freeman's outspokenly Protestant opinions on the " abject superstition " of some of the medieval saints, and bade him keep a civil tongue in his head on this point.
