A commentary to that article by Alice Dreger and Ellen Feder criticized that omission, stating that issues have barely changed in two decades, with " lack of novel developments ", while " lack of evidence appears not to have had much impact on physicians confidence in a standard of care that has remained largely unchanged . " Another 2016 commentary stated that the purpose of the 2006 Consensus Statement was to validate existing practices, " The authoritativeness and consensus in the Chicago statement lies not in comprehensive clinician input or meaningful community input, but in its utility to justify any and all forms of clinical intervention ."
42.
A commentary to that article by Alice Dreger and Ellen Feder criticized that omission, stating that issues have barely changed in two decades, with " lack of novel developments ", while " lack of evidence appears not to have had much impact on physicians confidence in a standard of care that has remained largely unchanged . " Another 2016 commentary stated that the purpose of the 2006 Consensus Statement was to validate existing practices, " The authoritativeness and " consensus " in the Chicago statement lies not in comprehensive clinician input or meaningful community input, but in its utility to justify any and all forms of clinical intervention ."
