In contrast to English and many other languages, Swedish does not use the perfect participle to form the present perfect and past perfect.
42.
This should probably be made clear in the article and definitely shouldn't be used as the first example of present perfect in use.
43.
For examples, see as well as the sections of that article relating to the simple past, present perfect continuous, and other perfect forms.
44.
The construction is parallel to that of the present perfect ( there is no difference in French between perfect and non-perfect forms ).
45.
It is highly archaic in its preservation of imperfective in aspect; the aorist ( perfective aspect ); a present perfect, pluperfect and future perfect.
46.
The implications of the present perfect ( that something occurred prior to the present moment ) are similar to those of the simple past.
47.
Note that unlike the present perfect, the past perfect can readily be used with an adverb specifying a past time frame for the occurrence.
48.
For specific uses of past tense constructions, see the sections below on present perfect ( or even other present tense forms see above ).
49.
These tenses ( except for present perfect ) correspond roughly to equvalent English perfect tenses ( I had read / I will have read ).
50.
Thus these comments do not fall in the as it happened timeframe, and I would suggest that for these the present perfect is more appropriate.
