There are books on " Discordant redshifts " lab demonstrations of the Wolf effect [ http : / / adsabs . harvard . edu / cgi-bin / nph-bib _ query ? bibcode = 1987PhRvL . . 58.2649B & db _ key = AST & data _ type = HTML, and " hundreds " of peer-reviewed paper on intrinsic, non-cosmological and quantised redshifts.
42.
But there are a number of phrases that he won't accept . ( a ) " Transverse redshift " appears to be mentioned in about 30 + articles and is included ( b ) " Intrinsic redshift " is mentioned in seven times as many references ( 210 + ) [ http : / / adsabs . harvard . edu / cgi-bin / dsp _ file ? id = 44514f831072, and not included ( c ) Periodic redshift / " Quantised redshifts " [ http : / / adsabs . harvard . edu / cgi-bin / dsp _ file ? id = 445151a31c0f get 200 + reference, and gets no mention.
43.
We know that schrodinger equation is associated with a non relativistic single particle, moving onto relativistic description of the single particle, we get klein gordon equation and then modified dirac equation . Now in QFT, when we quantise the field we see that both Klein gordon n dirac pictures get modified to many particle picture and also a single particle state is described by the field . so my question is do we discard the wave associated with the particle here as given by schrodinger equation ( as here we r associating a field with single partice ) . if not, then also how do we get to know that is it a wave or field assocaited with the single particle . if the answer is that the particle is relativistic then it is field associated with it n if it is non relativistic then a wave is associated with it.
