Safian finds an inconsistency and thus a “serious problem” in this note: on CNN's Reliable Sources Mr. Ricks described his source as “some U.S. military analysts,” while in the note he describes his source as “a senior Israeli official.” Which raises the question of whether Mr. Ricks had any source at all - besides himself, that is. The executive editor of the Washington Post, Leonard Downie Jr., has rebuked one of his Pulitzer-Prize winning reporters for suggesting on television that Israel was purposely leaving Hezbollah rockets in Lebanon “because as long as they're being rocketed, they can continue to have a sort of moral equivalency in their operations.” ... ऐसी शक्ति के साथ अंतर्निहित है कि जब पश्चिम किसी गैर-पश्चिम से युद्ध करता है तो युद्ध भूमि का परिणाम पता होता है .वह पहले ही तय हो जाता है और यह युद्ध एक परंपरागत युद्ध के स्थान पर एक पुलिस का छापा अधिक लगता है .पुलिस छापे की भांति ही आधुनिक युद्ध का आकलन उसकी वैधानिकता , शत्रुता की अवधि , सेना के अनुपात ,क्षति की गंभीरता और आर्थिक तथा पर्यावरणिक क्षति की सीमा से किया जाता है .
42.
Batsman comes according to batting order, this order is decided by captain. First two batsman are called as “”openers“”. In general they have to face most dangerous bowling, because that time fast bowlers are using new ball. Balance batting is relied on most reliable batsman of the team, and non batsman to be send in the end. It is not necessory to follow the batting order which was decided earlier, and when a wicket falls then any batsman can come to bat who didn't bat. बल्लेबाज बल्लेबाजी क्रम (batting order) में आते हैं यह क्रम कप्तान के द्वारा निर्धारित किया जाता है पहले दो बल्लेबाज ओपनर कहलाते हैं. उन्हें सामान्यत: सबसे खतरनाक गेंदबाजी का सामना करना पड़ता है क्योंकि उस समय तेज गेंदबाज नई गेंद का उपयोग करते हैं. शीर्ष बल्लेबाजी के लिए आम तौर पर टीम में सबसे अधिक सक्षम बल्लेबाज को भेजा जाता है और गैर बल्लेबाजों को अंत में भेजा जाता है. पहले से निर्धारित किया गया बल्लेबाजी क्रम अनिवार्य नहीं है और जब भी एक विकेट गिर जाता है तो कोई भी खिलाड़ी जिसने बल्लेबाजी नहीं की है उसे भेजा जा सकता है.
43.
The year 1880 saw the publication of a book that ranks as the single most important study of Islam ever. Written in German by a young Jewish Hungarian scholar, Ignaz Goldziher, and bearing the nondescript title Muslim Studies ( Muhammedanische Studien ), it argued that the hadith , the vast body of sayings and actions attributed to the Islamic prophet Muhammad, lacked historical validity. Rather than provide reliable details about Muhammad's life, Goldziher established, the hadith emerged from debates two or three centuries later about the nature of Islam. आरम्भिक इस्लाम को खोजना वर्ष 1880 में एक पुस्तक का प्रकाशन हुआ जो कि इस्लाम पर अभी तक का सबसे महत्वपूर्ण अध्ययन माना जाता है। हंगरी के एक युवा यहूदी लेखक इग्नाज गोल्दजिहर ने जर्मन में इस पुस्तक को लिखा और इसे शीर्षक दिया Muslim Studies ( Muhammedanische Studies) इसमें तर्क दिया गया कि जिस हदीथ को इस्लामिक पैगम्बर के कथन और कार्य का संग्रह माना जाता है वास्तव में उसकी ऐतिहासिक मान्यता नहीं है। मोहम्मद के जीवन के सम्बंध में विश्वसनीय रूप से विस्तारपूर्वक बताने के स्थान पर गोल्दजिहर ने इस बात को स्थापित किया कि हदीथ का आविर्भाव इस्लाम के स्वभाव को लेकर हुए बहस से दो या तीन शताब्दियों बाद हुआ।
44.
Unlike the Soviet bloc, the Muslim world lacks not access to reliable information but interest in it. The reasons are many but perhaps the most salient of them are a disposition to believe in conspiracy theories and an attraction to totalitarian solutions . Rather than try to purvey information to Muslims, State (and its counterparts elsewhere) should instead assert the case for liberal, secular, and humane values. More than facts, the Muslim world needs to understand the basics of what makes the West thrive - and thereby be inspired to emulate it. Related Topics: Media , Middle East patterns , US policy , Views of US receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item सोवियत लोगों के विपरीत मुस्लिम विश्व में उपयुक्त सूचनाओं का अभाव नहीं है वरन् उनकी इसमें रुचि नहीं है . इसके कई कारण हो सकते हैं . लेकिन सबसे महत्वपूर्ण कारण षड्यंत्रकारी सिद्धांत में विश्वास करना तथा समस्याओं के अधिनायकवादी समाधान की ओर आकर्षित होना है . राज्यों और मुसलमानों को सामग्री उपलब्ध कराने के बजाए उदारवादी , सेक्यूलर और मानवीय मूल्यों पर ज़ोर देना चाहिए . तथ्यों के बजाए मुस्लिम विश्व को समझना चाहिए कि पश्चिमी विश्व का विकास कैसे हुआ है और फिर इसकी बराबरी करने का प्रयास करना चाहिए .
45.
One must be cautious, as the authors are, and explain that correlation - even perfect correlation - does not imply causation. One must present a plausible explanation that could justify the claim of causation, and I have one. Most of the ignoramuses who opine or make policy regarding the Middle East and jihadists worldwide, believe that poverty causes war, just as poverty causes crime at home, and that terrorists must be given hope to stop their deadly rampage. However, we know that quite the opposite is true: poor people can choose to study hard, work hard, and lift themselves and their communities gradually out of poverty; crime causes poverty; terrorism causes poverty; and terrorists are given hope by the craven appeasement of the empty-headed Western intellectuals and politicians who come to bargain for their lives - at others' expense, of course. My theory is justified, I believe, by the strong relationship between foreign aid and homicides that occur one year later . Based on the strong linear correlation between foreign aid to the Palestinian Authority and the number of homicides committed by Palestinian Arabs one year later, I have used extrapolation to predict the consequences of a promised $7.4 billion in aid to the Palestinian Arabs. Please understand that extrapolation is far less reliable than interpolation. Nevertheless, my model predicts approximately 4600 homicides can be expected within a year after the infusion of the pledged foreign aid. This is equivalent to the murder of some 215,000 Americans. Dec. 30, 2007 update : For an exchange on the methodology of the Stotsky study, see the challenge from Basel Saleh, Asst. Professor of Economics, Radford University and Steven Stotsky at “ False Analysis .” Related Topics: Palestinians , US policy receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item 1993 में ओस्लो समझौते के आरम्भ से इजरायल की युद्ध अर्थव्यस्था की समझ में संशय उत्पन्न हुआ है। अपने शत्रुओं को संसाधनों से विहीन करने के स्थान पर इजरायल के लोग शिमोन पेरेज के रहस्यमयी विचार को अपना रहे हैं कि नये मध्य पूर्व की रचना हो और वे सशक्त बनाये जायें। जैसा कि मैने 2001 में लिखा था कि एक ओर शत्रु से लड़ा जाये और उसी के साथ उसे संसाधन उपलब्ध कराये जाएं यह अच्छा विचार नहीं है। सभी पश्चिमी देशों को इजरायल से आरम्भ कर फिलीस्तीनी युद्ध को आर्थिक सहायता देने के स्थान पर इसे बन्द कर दिया जाये।
46.
When one puts this in the context of what Obama said off-mic to then-Russian president Dmitry Medvedev in March 2012 (“This is my last election. And after my election, I have more flexibility”) and in the context of Obama's dislike for Netanyahu , it would be wise to assume that, if Obama wins on Nov. 6, things will “calm down” for him and he finally can “be more up front” about so-called Palestine. Then Israel's troubles will really begin. Sep. 5, 2012 update : Before the Democrats restored mention of Jerusalem as Israel's capital to its party platform, Romney called the omission “very troubling” and “one more example of Israel being thrown under the bus by the president.” Sep. 16, 2012 update :Appearing on NBC's Meet the Press , Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu twice avoided answering the question of whether Obama throws Israel “under the bus” or not, finally relenting the third time. Of course, he had to deny the charge, which does not enhance Mitt Romney's credibility. Meet the Press : Governor Romney for a year, and he said it in his convention speech, has said, “President Obama has thrown allies like Israel under the bus.” Do you agree or disagree with Governor Romney's charge? It's a serious charge. Binyamin Netanyahu : Well, you're trying to get me into the American election. and I'm not going to do that. the relationship between Israel and the United States is just a very powerful bond. It was, it is, and will be. and will continue to be. and I can tell you there's no one-there's no leader in the world who's more appreciative than me of the strength of this alliance. it's very strong. There's no one in Israel who appreciates more than me the importance of American support for Israel. It's not a partisan issue. In fact, we cherish the bipartisan support of Democrats and Republicans alike. This is critical for us. Meet the Press : … It seems to me for you to remain silent on whether this administration has thrown Israel under the bus is tantamount to agreeing with the sentiment. So where do you come down on that specific charge against President Obama ? Binyamin Netanyahu : There you go again, David, trying to draw me into something that is something not the case and is not my position. my position is that we have strong cooperation and we continue to cooperate with the best of allies. And Israel is the one reliable ally of the United States in the Middle East . Meet the Press : President Obama has not thrown Israel under the bus? Binyamin Netanyahu : There's no bus, and we're not going to get into that discussion, except to say one thing. We have a strong alliance, and we're going to continue to have a strong alliance. I think the important question is where does the-the only bus that is really important is the Iranian nuclear bus. That's the one that we have to derail. And that's my interest. That's my only interest. David Gregory and Binyamin Netanyahu on “Meet the Press,” Sep. 16, 2012. Mar. 20, 2013 update :Abunimah has just posted a picture of the whole gang - himself, the Khalidis, the Obamas, and the Saids - at a Chicago dinner. Obama and his anti-Zionist friends: Abunimah, Khalidi, and Said. Related Topics: Israel & Zionism , US policy receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item यदि मार्च 2012 में रूस के राष्ट्रपति देमेत्री मेडडेव के साथ माइक्रोफोन से अलग जो कुछ ओबामा ने कहा ( कि यह मेरा अंतिम चुनाव है और चुनाव के उपरांत मैं अधिक लचीला हो जाऊँगा ) उसे इस संदर्भ के साथ जोडें और ओबामा द्वारा नेतन्याहू को नापसंद करने से संदर्भ से भी जोडें तो यह पूर्वानुमान लगाया जा सकता है कि यदि ओबामा 6 नवम्बर को निर्वाचित होते हैं तो उनके लिये चीजें अधिक सहज हो जायेंगी और वे तथाकथित फिलीस्तीन के लिये अधिक मुखर होंगे। इसके उपरांत इजरायल का संकट आरम्भ होगा।
