Surely Wikipedia has a policy for those such as Arcayne, who are able to place 18, 000 edits in 22 months using his Superior Authority " as an Oxfordian with multiple degrees to bluff and cajole in an effort to " Win " for winnings sake.
42.
In early June 1831, Smith was ordained to the " high priesthood ", along with twenty-two other men, including prominent figures in the Latter Day Saint movement such as Hyrum Smith, Parley P . Pratt, and apostles gave them superior authority than that of other high priests.
43.
The term denotes both the regular exaction of an area s revenue by the king, like the Scottish king s exaction of payment in the Southern Uplands, as well as irregular tribute to a superior authority, as was the case in Moray during its period of quasi-independence prior to the mid-11th century.
44.
Utterly and completely wrong, told so by large groups of fellow editors and he still forces the point based upon his " Superior Authority " as an " Expert . " It harms the Wiki mission and violates the communities trust that others operate in Good Faith . talk ) 23 : 27, 5 July 2008 ( UTC)
45.
As he has frequently invoked the " Superior Authority " of his multiple Oxford degrees and education and on numerous occasions brandished his Oxford academic honors to defend and enshrine his edits in Wikipedia and to eliminate the need for discussion, this is having a very strong influence on many articles and editors-and are riddled with ignorant errors:
46.
According to the first incise of the 90th article, the president was the supreme authority of the Confederation in what was called a " presidentialist " regime : the president need not answer for his / her actions to any superior authority, inside the mark given by the constitution, and did not required of the Congress approval for the exercise of the competent attributions.
47.
Judicial and public security workers held meetings to seek ways " to strengthen the building of the legal forces . . . and socialist legal systems . " A theoretical study group from the Supreme People's Court affirmed that the courts and the public security organs were solely responsible for maintaining public order, and they called on the people to accept the views of superior authorities.
48.
As with the Dostler case, it also rejected the contention of a number of the defendants that they were not legally responsible for their acts because they performed the acts under the orders of superior authority, stating that " " the true test . . . is not the existence of the order but whether moral choice ( in executing it ) was in fact possible " ."
