?? ? is not itself a trigraph sequence, but when followed by a character such as-it will be interpreted as ? + ? ?-, as in the example below which has 16 ( 5x3 + 1 ) ? s before the /.
42.
Hungarian, likewise, has a couple of digraphs and a trigraph, where insertion of an 9 s :, which by itself writes postalveolar, next to alveolar fricatives and affricates 9 z c dz :, turns them into postalveolar fricatives and affricates respectively : 9 zs cs dzs :.
43.
As it has already been said, standard Ijekavian Serbo-Croatian writes trigraph " ije " at the place of old long yat, which is in standard pronunciation manifested disyllabically ( within Croatian standard monosyllabic pronunciation ), and writes " je " at the place of short yat.
44.
Around the year 1200, there was a tendency towards a standardized Middle High German language and spelling for the first time, based on the trigraph " sch " for and the occasional use of " v " for because around the 12th and 13th century, the prevocalic was voiced.
45.
A character ( or digraph or trigraph ) was represented by two axes of dots, in which the first column had one to six dots denoting the row in the matrix, and the second had one to six dots denoting the column : e . g ., 4 2 for " t " represented by
46.
The pronunciation for the digraph } } is extremely rare, but could be heard in literary and scholarly words or when reading ancient texts ( by a few readers ); normally it retains its " original " pronunciation only in the trigraph } }, where } } prevents the sonorization of } } by } } ( hence ).
47.
A third possible problem is that although hyphenation strictly follows pronunciation, long consonants pronounced as short are treated as if they were pronounced long ( e . g . millim�ter is pronounced [ milim�ter ] so hyphenation could be " mi-lli-m?ter " but it follows the written form and will be " mil-li-m?ter, " or " Kossuth " is hyphenated as " Kos-suth, " although the " ss " is pronounced short . ) A further problem is that " dz " is not considered as a genuine diphthong by current Hungarian phonology, but it is treated as a digraph, and both of its letters should be moved together ( e . g . " ma-dzag " string ) and the trigraph " dzs " is also treated as a single letter, even when it is pronounced long ( e . g . " me-ne-dzser " impresario ).
