They are probably subspecies of " Callicebus torquatus ".
2.
Another is a member of the Callicebus genus.
3.
:Does this count as weird : Stephen Nash's Titi " Callicebus stephennashi "?
4.
Full scientific descriptions of the monkeys, Callicebus bernardi and Callicebus stephennashi, were published in a special supplement to the peer-review journal Neotropical Primates.
5.
Full scientific descriptions of the monkeys, Callicebus bernardi and Callicebus stephennashi, were published in a special supplement to the peer-review journal Neotropical Primates.
6.
Full scientific descriptions of the monkeys, Callicebus bernhardi and Callicebus stephennashi, were published in a special supplement to the peer-review journal Neotropical Primates.
7.
Full scientific descriptions of the monkeys, Callicebus bernhardi and Callicebus stephennashi, were published in a special supplement to the peer-review journal Neotropical Primates.
8.
Taxonomically, it is a member of the " Callicebus cupreus " group, following Shunsuke Kobayashi's " Callicebus " grouping.
9.
Taxonomically, it is a member of the " Callicebus cupreus " group, following Shunsuke Kobayashi's " Callicebus " grouping.
10.
It is a member of the subfamily Callicebinae, of which the only extant genus is " Callicebus ", containing all of the titi monkeys.
