| 1. | The fraudulent transfers were made to international accounts, including banks in Latvia.
|
| 2. | Unlike the intentional fraudulent transfer, no intention to defraud is necessary.
|
| 3. | Ultimately, the Bank was able to block US $ 243, 46 of the fraudulent transfers.
|
| 4. | The archetypal example is the intentional fraudulent transfer.
|
| 5. | The second is a constructive fraudulent transfer.
|
| 6. | This requirement is consistent with the fact that transmutations are subject to the laws governing fraudulent transfers.
|
| 7. | First, there are federal and state Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act which defines what constitutes a fraudulent transfer.
|
| 8. | There are two kinds of fraudulent transfer.
|
| 9. | Accordingly, it found that the bank was not liable for the losses resulting from the fraudulent transfers.
|
| 10. | First, there are federal and state Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act which defines what constitutes a fraudulent transfer.
|
