Fr ., that clustered together with high statistical support, as perhaps the nucleus of an emerging monophyletic Hysteriales.
2.
Although Franz von H�hnel ( 1918 ) considered the Hysteriaceae to be pyrenomycetes, he proposed a radical revision of the Hysteriales.
3.
The Hysteriales were placed in the subclass Loculoascomycetes by Luttrell ( 1955 ), corresponding to the Ascoloculares first proposed by Nannfeldt ( 1932 ).
4.
Barr ( 1979 ) also originally held a wide view of the Hysteriales, but, unlike Luttrell ( 1973 ), maintained the two family distinction.
5.
The nearest association of this Hysteriales core group was with members of the Tubeufiaceae M . E . Barr and the Botryosphaeriaceae Theiss . & P . Syd.
6.
Although Luttrell held a very wide concept of the " Hysteriales " ( 1973 ), he did not recognize the family Lophiaceae, instead proposing a subfamily within the Hysteriaceae to accommodate mytilinidiaceous forms.
7.
In Rabenhorst s " Kryptogamen-Flora, Die Pilze ", Heinrich Rehm ( 1896 ) compromised and placed the " Hysteriales " as an order intermediate between the pyrenomycetes and the discomycetes.
8.
Modern attempts at classification have placed the Hysteriaceae in the " Pseudosphaeriales ", the Dothiorales, the Dothideales and in a separate order the " Hysteriales ", closely related to the Pleosporales.
9.
Later, Barr ( 1983 ) abandoned the Hysteriales and placed the Hysteriaceae within the Pleosporales due to the presence of cellular pseudoparaphyses, asci borne in a basal rather than peripheral layer and ascospores typically showing bipolar asymmetry.
10.
Her publications include the description of Discomycetes from California ( Cash 1958 ), Hawaii ( Cash 1938 ), Discomycetes and Hysteriales from Florida ( Cash 1943 ), South America, India and fungi found on living orchids.
