| 1. | The mobility analogy maps mechanical force to electric current instead of voltage.
|
| 2. | Historically, the impedance analogy was in use long before the mobility analogy.
|
| 3. | The difficulty with mass in mechanical analogies is not limited to the mobility analogy.
|
| 4. | The impedance analogy maps force to voltage whereas the mobility analogy maps force to current.
|
| 5. | The mobility analogy preserves the network topology but does not preserve the analogy between impedances.
|
| 6. | This leads to two classes of analogies, the impedance analogies and the mobility analogies.
|
| 7. | The impedance analogy makes force and voltage analogous while the mobility analogy makes force and current analogous.
|
| 8. | The mechanical analogue in the mobility analogy of the constant current generator is the constant force generator.
|
| 9. | A new analogy was proposed by Floyd A . Firestone in 1933 now known as the mobility analogy.
|
| 10. | There is also the mobility analogy, in which force corresponds to current and velocity corresponds to voltage.
|
