| 1. | It is what defines sign, object, and interpretant in general.
|
| 2. | One of Peirce's distinctions was that of distinguishing an interpretant from an interpreter.
|
| 3. | Here one forms an interpretant expressing a meaning or ramification of the sign about the object.
|
| 4. | The dynamic interpretant is an actuality.
|
| 5. | The final interpretant is a kind of norm or necessity unaffected by actual trends of opinion or interpretation.
|
| 6. | For example, one way to approach the concept of an interpretant is to think of a psycholinguistic process.
|
| 7. | The immediate interpretant is a quality of impression which a sign is fitted to produce, a special potentiality.
|
| 8. | That essentially triadic process is logically structured to perpetuate itself and is what defines sign, object, and interpretant.
|
| 9. | The connection that a sign makes to an interpretant is here referred to as its " connotation ".
|
| 10. | The interpretant depends likewise on both the sign and the object an object determines a sign to determine an interpretant.
|
मोबाइल