Unlike the suborder Microchiroptera, members of the Megachiroptera, such as " P . lucasi " do not echolocate.
2.
In the 1980s, a hypothesis based on morphological evidence was offered that stated the Megachiroptera evolved flight separately from the Microchiroptera.
3.
Despite the larger size observed in the females, M . pusillus is still one of the smaller mammals in the Megachiroptera suborder.
4.
Out of two traditionally recognized suborders Megachiroptera ( megabats ) and Microchiroptera ( microbats / echolocating bats ), the greater noctule bat belongs to the Microchiroptera suborder.
5.
Bats have been traditionally thought to belong to one of two monophyletic groups, a view that is reflected in their classification into two suborders ( Megachiroptera and Microchiroptera ).
6.
The so-called flying primate hypothesis proposes that, when adaptations to flight are removed, the Megachiroptera are allied to primates by anatomical features not shared with Microchiroptera.
7.
Novacek ( 1987 ) reanalyzed morphology of " Icaronycteris " and " Palaeochiropteryx " and concluded that they are more closely related to Microchroptera than to Megachiroptera.
8.
Bats are mammals that are classified into two orders Megachiroptera ( megabats ), in which fruit bats belong; and Microchiroptera ( microbats ) which includes all the other bats.
9.
The traditional subdivision between Megachiroptera and Microchiroptera reflects the view that these groups of bats have evolved independently of each other for a long time, from a common ancestor already capable of flight.
10.
Bats were formerly grouped in the superorder Archonta, along with the treeshrews ( Scandentia ), colugos ( Dermoptera ), and the primates, because of the apparent similarities between Megachiroptera and such mammals.