| 11. | The interpretant depends likewise on both the sign and the object an object determines a sign to determine an interpretant.
|
| 12. | The process is logically structured to perpetuate itself, and is definitive of sign, object, and interpretant in general.
|
| 13. | When a second sign is considered, the initial interpretant may be confirmed, or new possible meanings may be identified.
|
| 14. | The interpretant depends likewise on both the sign and the object the object determines the sign to determine the interpretant.
|
| 15. | The interpretant depends likewise on both the sign and the object the object determines the sign to determine the interpretant.
|
| 16. | One does not actually obtain a final interpretant per se; instead one may successfully " coincide " with it.
|
| 17. | This effect is what Peirce called the " interpretant sign ", or the " interpretant " for short.
|
| 18. | This effect is what Peirce called the " interpretant sign ", or the " interpretant " for short.
|
| 19. | The interpretant, then, is a further sign of the object, and thus enables and determines still further interpretations, further interpretant signs.
|
| 20. | The interpretant, then, is a further sign of the object, and thus enables and determines still further interpretations, further interpretant signs.
|
