My argument has two parts. First, the essentialist position of many analysts is wrong; and second, a reformed Islam can emerge. Arguing Against Essentialism आवश्यक रूप से शास्त्रीय स्थिति ही रहेगी इसके विरुद्ध तर्क
2.
Sadowski quoted my words accurately but turned their meaning upside-down; he transformed my rather prosaic observation of fact into part of a grand theory that I never enunciated - and which, for the record, I repudiate. Throughout my work, I stress mutability and change and argue against historical essentialism concerning Islam . I see the Muslim world as changing and avoid extrapolations from present-day circumstances to the future. I make a point not to say something will “always” be a certain way. Further, contrary to Sadowski, I hold that Islam and democracy are indeed compatible . स्टानफोर्ड विश्वविद्यालय के जोएल बीनिन और मिडिल ईस्ट रिपोर्ट के जोये स्ट्रोक ने सादोवस्की के लेख को पुनः अपने सह सम्पादित कैलिफोर्निया विश्वविद्यालय प्रेस की पुस्तक Political Islam: Essays from Middle East Report में प्रकाशित किया और इसमें मुझे पृष्ठ 34 पर उद्धृत किया।
मोबाइल