Just about anyone even casually acquainted with number theory knows the anecdote about the mathematicians Hardy and Ramanujan talking about the seeming uninterestingness of the number 1729.
2.
:" MacDonald's uninterestingness is not unusual at all . . . When a journalist fetches up against someone like [ him ], all he can do is flee and hope that a more suitable subject will turn up soon.
3.
Please see the deletion page for " Elbert bill "; I there suggested ( at the outset ) that such non-articles should be put out of their misery at birth : people shouldn't have to spend time on Google ( etc . ) in order to judge notability, truthfulness, etc . Unless I misunderstand, zapping a crappy article doesn't prevent somebody from writing a better article on the same subject at some later time . ( This is after all what happens when a new article is a copyvio . ) So again, I suggest zapping this article and anything like it on the grounds of a " combination " of more than one damning factor ( here, utter uninterestingness and a complete lack of demonstration of notability ), aggravated by the certain expenditure of time that a Vfd leads to .-- Hoary 10 : 33, 15 Dec 2004 ( UTC)
मोबाइल